Birao is a town in the far north-east of the Central African Republic with a population of around 10,000 in the last census, and perhaps 18,000 today. It currently hosts more than 27,000 Sudanese refugees. The town has more than doubled, and then some.

In June, it started receiving Central Africans as well.

Advertisement — ad space reserved

Two crises meeting in one town

The first crisis arrived from the north. Since April 2023, more than 35,000 Sudanese have crossed into the Central African Republic to escape the war between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces. Almost all of them come through a single border post, Am-Dafock, because since South Sudan’s independence in 2011 it has been the only remaining crossing between the two countries.

From there they travel about 60 kilometres to Birao, where the government established a settlement called Korsi — the word means “welcome” in Sango — which now holds roughly 22,000 people. Another 13,000 refugees are spread across five other prefectures.

The second crisis started at the border itself. On 30 June, fighters of the Alliance for Patriotic Renewal, a Central African rebel group that includes foreign mercenaries, attacked government forces at Am-Dafock. Residents of nearby villages described shooting, burning houses and people scattering along the roads. No official casualty figure has been released. Those who fled went to Birao, and settled beside the camp that was already there.

The Special Criminal Court for the Central African Republic said in July it would carry out a preliminary assessment with a view to opening an investigation into the attack.

Where this is happening

Vakaga prefecture covers 46,500 square kilometres — larger than Denmark — with a population estimated at under 90,000. It is among the poorest and least served regions of a country that is itself among the world’s poorest. Population density is roughly one person per square kilometre.

The road from Am-Dafock to Birao is in poor enough condition that rehabilitating it is a live item in humanitarian planning documents, with the UN refugee agency offering to supply fuel and manpower to the peacekeeping mission to get it done. That is the scale of the infrastructure question: not a highway programme, but whether the only road can carry goods at all.

Advertisement — ad space reserved

The number that explains the rest

In April, four UN agencies working in the country — the refugee agency, the World Food Programme, UNICEF and the humanitarian coordination office — issued a joint appeal noting that the 2026 refugee response plan for the Central African Republic was 11 per cent funded.

Eleven per cent is not a shortfall that careful management absorbs. It is the difference between a shelter programme and a tarpaulin, between a school and a list of children who are not in one. The plan for Korsi involves replacing emergency shelters with 3,776 semi-durable houses at about $2,000 each, along with the same number of latrines. At current funding that arithmetic does not work.

The Central African government’s policy is notably generous on paper: refugees are settled within existing towns rather than closed camps, and included in national health and education systems. That approach is widely regarded as better than encampment. It also means the pressure lands directly on services in a town that had very few to begin with.

Why you have not read about this

Two reasons, and neither is that it is unimportant.

The first is access. Vakaga is remote, insecure, and expensive to reach; there is an airstrip at Birao and a road that may or may not be passable. Wire agencies do not station correspondents there, and a story requiring a chartered flight rarely clears an editor’s cost threshold.

The second is that it is a spillover. The Sudan war gets reported — thinly, but it gets reported — as events inside Sudan. What happens across the border to the countries absorbing the consequences is a second-order story, and second-order stories are what disappear when newsroom budgets contract.

The information exists. UN situation reports on Vakaga are published regularly and are public. Nobody is hiding this. It simply is not being read.

Advertisement — ad space reserved

Sources

UNHCR joint appeal with WFP, UNICEF and OCHA, 10 April 2026; UNHCR Operational Data Portal figures for the Central African Republic; UN Office at Geneva reporting from Birao; Africanews; IOM Central African Republic Crisis Response Plan 2026; OCHA situation reports on the Am-Dafock displacement; 2003 census and 2024 population estimates for Vakaga.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *